●
|
For
segment reporting purposes, the Company’s delivery centers are more
analogous to factories of a manufacturing company rather than
separate
segments, because the services the various delivery centers
provide and
the manner in which they provide them are quite similar.
|
|
●
|
The
Company organizes its business by COE in order to focus on
client
relationships. The similarity of economic and non-economic
characteristics of the COEs stems from the fact that they are
intended to
insure the best delivery of services to a client; they are
not separate
product lines.
|
●
|
The
Company’s business is carried out by entering a single MSA with each
client regardless of the COEs that provide the services and
regardless of
the delivery center or centers from which such services are
provided. Pricing is governed by the MSA for each client and
therefore is handled consistently across the COEs.
|
|
●
|
The
Company confirms that it believes all of its COEs meet the
aggregation
criteria of paragraph 17 of FAS 131 and can therefore be aggregated
into
one segment.
|
|
●
|
In
particular, the Company confirms that the COEs not aggregated
into the
“India-based segment,” namely [redacted] meet all of the
aggregation criteria of Paragraph 17 of FAS 131 with India
and can thus be
aggregated into one segment with the India-based segment.
|
|
●
|
[redacted]
In addition, because the COEs change frequently in
response to client needs, EBIT by COE also changes.
|
|
●
|
[redacted]
|
|
●
|
Although
the Staff noted that there are limitations on the use of forward-looking
information for purposes of FAS 131,
[redacted]
|